Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soma Sonic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as expired WP:PROD. ansh 666 10:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soma Sonic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've done my best but can't find enough substantive content to justify keeping this article. The most significant coverage I can find are two reviews on Exclaim.ca ([1] and [2], one for each of their albums) and I just don't think it's enough. I've checked AllMusic, Google, GNews, GBooks, and Highbeam and come up dry.

That being said there may be electronic music RSes that I've missed, so I am happy to withdraw if anything substantive is located. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.